- From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:59:06 -0700
On 3/16/2012 5:25 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 3/16/12 7:43 PM, James Robinson wrote: >> You can s/web developers/users/ and the statement would still apply, >> wouldn't it? > > Sure, but so what? > > The upshot is that people are writing code that assumes little-endian > hardware all over. We should just clearly make the spec say that > that's what typed arrays are so that an implementor can actually > implement the spec and be web compatible. > > The value of a spec which can't be implemented as written is arguably > lower than not having a spec at all... At least then you _know_ you > have to reverse-engineer. Isn't that an issue for TC39?
Received on Friday, 16 March 2012 17:59:06 UTC