- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 15:39:38 -0400
On 03/12/12 15:00, Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:16 PM, Philipp Serafin <phil127 at gmail.com> > wrote: >> I admit, I haven't really followed this debate. But out of >> interest: Is it by now actually possible to write any kind of >> implementation that complies to both, the HTML5 *and* the RDFa >> specification? > > As Ian said, the HTML5 spec allows extensions by other > specifications. > > The HTML5+RDFa specification is making use of that facility. > > By writing an implementation that complies with HTML5+RDFa, you > write an implementation that complies with both. Yes, what Benjamin and Ian said. Additionally, HTML5+RDFa spec does not support the @version attribute in HTML5+RDFa: "The version attribute is not supported in HTML5 and is non-conforming. However, if an HTML+RDFa document contains the version attribute on the HTML element, a conforming RDFa Processor must examine the value of this attribute. If the value matches that of a defined version of RDFa, then the processing rules for that version must be used. If the value does not match a defined version, or there is no version attribute, then the processing rules for the most recent version of RDFa 1.1 must be used." It also should be possible to write a parser implementation that is capable of complying with both the HTML5 specification and the HTML+RDFa specification. You may want to read the latest HTML+RDFa specification for details: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-rdfa-in-html-20120315/ If after reading the explanation and document above, you still do not think this is possible, please explain exactly what you feel is not possible and why. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) President/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: PaySwarm Website for Developers Launched http://digitalbazaar.com/2012/02/22/new-payswarm-alpha/
Received on Monday, 12 March 2012 12:39:38 UTC