W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2012

Re: [whatwg] Responsive images using http headers

From: Anselm Hannemann <info@anselm-hannemann.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:18:17 +0200
Message-Id: <8CFD791B-F890-4907-8F7F-D60EB705F549@anselm-hannemann.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
Am 26.06.2012 um 15:52 schrieb Boris Zbarsky:
> On 6/26/12 4:41 AM, Oscar Otero wrote:
>> I understand the problem. Sending only the window dimmensions, screen
>> resolution and other useful information available in media-queries can be
>> enought. For example:
>> Viewport: width=1024px; height=768px; scale=1;
>> Or even connection information:
>> Connection: type=2G;
> I think those have been proposed before.  Worth looking into why those proposals didn't get traction.
> Note, by the way, that in the case of subframes the viewport dimensions are _also_ not available when image loads kick off.
> -Boris

A responsive image cannot be determined by connection type. Not everyone on a slow connection will get a lowres-image. This is what a developer has to decide which way to go or otherwise (approach of WHATWG -> srcset / resolution based) the browser has to decide.
Also, what happens if there's a new type of connection available in future  you cannot rely on browser updates then.

Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2012 14:18:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:43 UTC