W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2012

Re: [whatwg] <video preload> implementation feedback

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 18:32:16 +0000 (UTC)
To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1206141831250.26380@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Simon Pieters wrote:
> It's not more. But it still is. Even though images aren't required to 
> load at all, you still recently changed the way they load to be 
> compatible (http://html5.org/r/7128 ). We should also specify how videos 
> load to be compatible. We can do it now and get everyone to align on a 
> good behavior, or we can wait and do it in a few years when Web content 
> relies on what the market leader does, whether that's good or bad 
> behavior.

I don't understand what behaviour it is that you think we should define. 
As far as I can tell, the spec is as detailed as it can be here given the 
range of possible implementation strategies that we need to allow.

Could you give a concrete example of what you are concerned about?

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 18:32:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:43 UTC