- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 18:32:16 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Simon Pieters wrote: > > It's not more. But it still is. Even though images aren't required to > load at all, you still recently changed the way they load to be > compatible (http://html5.org/r/7128 ). We should also specify how videos > load to be compatible. We can do it now and get everyone to align on a > good behavior, or we can wait and do it in a few years when Web content > relies on what the market leader does, whether that's good or bad > behavior. I don't understand what behaviour it is that you think we should define. As far as I can tell, the spec is as detailed as it can be here given the range of possible implementation strategies that we need to allow. Could you give a concrete example of what you are concerned about? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 18:32:58 UTC