- From: Olli Pettay <Olli.Pettay@helsinki.fi>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 10:56:45 +0300
- To: Jer Noble <jer.noble@apple.com>
- Cc: Chris Pearce <cpearce@mozilla.com>, Vincent Scheib <scheib@google.com>, whatwg <whatwg@lists.whatwg.org>, Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, robert@ocallahan.org
On 06/05/2012 09:31 AM, Jer Noble wrote: > > On Jun 4, 2012, at 11:23 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > >> If you implemented that proposal as-is then authors would usually need a listener on the document as well as the element, and as Chris pointed >> out, it's simpler to just always listen on the document. >> >> Is that true for the Webkit implementation or did you implement something slightly different? > > Sorry, you're right; we did implement something slightly different. We always dispatch a message to the element, and additionally one the document > if the element has been removed from the document. So authors only have to add event listeners to one or the other. That is rather unusual behavior. I don't recall any other cases when such additional event is dispatched if node is removed from document. -Olli > > -Jer >
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2012 07:59:47 UTC