Re: [whatwg] Suggest making <dt> and <dd> valid in <ol> from Ian Yang on 2012-07-14 (public-whatwg-archive@w3.org from July 2012)

From: Ian Yang <ian.html@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 23:51:50 +0800
To: whatwg@whatwg.org
Message-ID: <CAFhBhuOtt2sRZmhizXtGwSvYfwd2_vRLh8K3anT9b0T8SpimDw@mail.gmail.com>

2012/7/14 Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>

> Indeed. The <ol> element is no more and no less ordered than <ul> or any
> other element. Many HTML tag names are misleading.
>

That's interesting. If <ol> is no more and no less ordered than <ul>,
what's the purpose of its introduction? Could you provide detailed
explanations or examples? Thanks.


Sincerely,
Ian Yang

Received on Saturday, 14 July 2012 15:52:16 UTC