W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2012

Re: [whatwg] iframe sandbox attribute

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:35:40 -0400
Message-ID: <4FFCD86C.80403@mit.edu>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: whatwg@lists.whatwg.org
On 7/10/12 12:27 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:

> Since it doesn't for any other attributes that take a string but where
> empty string and absence are different, why is it suddenly an issue
> specifically with this attribute?

Because this is a new attribute we're defining and I happened to notice?  ;)

> I think the situation would be different if you were asking about changing
> the behaviour of all content attributes rather than one specific one.
> That's what Simon is arguing for here:
>     https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17283
> I'm not sure that makes sense either, but it's more plausible, IMHO,
> especially given that at least one UA apparently already does it. If Gecko
> also changed in this manner it would make the decision a lot easier. :-)

Hmm.  That might be doable, in fact.  I'll shop it around.

Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2012 01:36:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:43 UTC