- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 01:47:06 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Etienne Levesque Guitard wrote: > > As I mentioned on http://forums.whatwg.org/bb3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=4663, > it seems that many of the implementation statuses on the spec documents > are outdated. > > Example: Isn't the <header> element already supported by many browsers? > I can confirm Firefox and Chromium being able to style this element. > > Anyone has any idea on this? On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > > The implementation statuses are not automatically generated - they're > updated when someone cares enough to update them. Anyone can do so, > though it's not very discoverable. Hold down Ctrl+Alt and double-click > the status box, and it'll pop up a login prompt. Make an account, then > you can change the statuses however you want. Indeed. On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Aryeh Gregor wrote: > > Maybe this should be documented clearly through a "how to update" link > on the status boxes or such? On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Etienne Levesque Guitard wrote: > > Except that having it not documented might be a good idea in reducing > unwanted changes; as in only someone who's really interested will make > the efforts of signing up to the mailing list and asking how it's done. I made a change a few weeks ago to try to improve matters without going too far, so now if you hover over the boxes you get an "edit" link. Hopefully that helps a little... -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 12 January 2012 17:47:06 UTC