- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2012 17:11:12 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Victor Costan <costan@gmail.com>
- Cc: whatwg@whatwg.org
On Wed, 5 Dec 2012, Victor Costan wrote: > > There was a thread on this mailing list discussing making it possible to > set the file data behind an <input type="file"> element. > http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2012-May/thread.html#36140 > > The thread seems to have died down due to insufficient applications for > the proposal. Actually the reason this thread hasn't gone anywhere is that there seems to only be implementer interest from Chrome. See: http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/New_Features_Awaiting_Implementation_Interest > 1) This would make it possible to write JavaScript libraries that > seamlessly scan the current page for <input type="file"> and add > integration with Dropbox / Google Drive / Sky Drive etc. I claim that > changing the <input> value is the easiest and most robust method of > achieving this without requiring changes to the main application code. > Asides from providing an easy path for developers to integrate online > storage services into their apps, this change would make it easy to > write bookmarklets / browser extensions that add this functionality to > any Web application. It seems like this use case would be better handled by having the sites offer an API to the browser, similar to Web Intents, for picking a file. That way you wouldn't need to update each site -- every site would support all the drive systems you use. > 2) If I can set the files attribute of an <input type="file">, I can > write unit tests for any code that deals with such an <input>, such as > XHR uploads. Tested code is less likely to break down as it is > maintained, so it makes for a better Web. That's an interesting use case, indeed. > 3) Browser extensions / bookmarklets could easily filter files being > uploaded. For example, an extension could automatically resize pictures > larger than a certain threshold by rendering them to an off-screen > <canvas>. As another example, an extension could detect when huge files > are uploaded to a Web mail client or forum, automatically upload them to > Dropbox / Google Drive / Sky Drive, and replace them in the <input > type="file"> with tiny ".url" files pointing to the real files. In general, browser extensions don't have to be handled by Web standard APIs, so I'm not sure that's a compelling use case. > With these applications in mind, I don't think FileList needs to accept > Blobs. Instead, there should be an easy way to build a File out of a > Blob and a file name. This capability seems to have been lost when > BlobBuilder was deprecated by the Blob constructor. There are places where FileList definitely needs to be readonly, so I don't think it makes sense to make it globally writable. but there could be a MutableFileList or something. That feedback should be sent to the list mentioned at the top of the File API spec. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 5 December 2012 17:11:43 UTC