- From: Rick Waldron <waldron.rick@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2012 13:52:49 -0500
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Cc: WHATWG <whatwg@whatwg.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Only feedback left is the return types of set(), append(), and delete(). > > > > In Maps, set() returns the map, so you can chain more easily. TC39 > > hasn't yet made delete() return the map, but they plan to (baby steps, > > apparently, but us jumping on it will help). Obviously, append() > > should match set(). > > Right, once I have a definitive answer to > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-script-coord/2012OctDec/0164.html > I will update a bunch of APIs to use chaining (assuming the answer is > that yes, this is the plan). I'm not really a fan of the style myself > so I'm not sure I want to be the one to push TC39 :-) > The definitive answer is that we discussed this at the TC39 in-person this past week and the collection mutation methods will return |this|. I will be publishing the meetings notes on Monday and the next draft will reflect these changes Rick > > > -- > http://annevankesteren.nl/ >
Received on Saturday, 1 December 2012 19:56:08 UTC