- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:49:34 +0200
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 05:31:57 +0200, Makoto Kato <m_kato at ga2.so-net.ne.jp> wrote: > Except to OS/2 and AIX, I think that this encoding is unnecessary since > most browsers aren't supported. If you only add IBM864 and IBM866 to > this spec as legacy encoding, you should add all encodings that Gecko > supports due to ambiguous. That could work too. Currently 864 is not supported by Opera and 866 is not supported by Chrome. As far as I know the other IBM encodings have less support. I suppose we should look at content to see how often they are still used on pages with bytes greater than 0x7F. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Monday, 23 April 2012 23:49:34 UTC