- From: Nils Dagsson Moskopp <nils@dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
- Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2011 03:04:50 +0200
Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at MIT.EDU> schrieb am Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:34:18 -0400: > On 9/10/11 7:53 PM, Nils Dagsson Moskopp wrote: > > Is fragment use in data URIs possible at all? > > Possible, and desirable; otherwise SVG data: URIs are pretty much > useless. Thanks, I had not thought of that. > > The last point ? interoperability ? is satisfied by any widely > > implemented outcome. The first point ? author expectations ? I > > question. So, how often does this occur? > > Having a '#' in the document being encoded in a data: URI? Pretty > much any time the document includes any CSS (colors) or SVG (paint > servers and the like). Oops, partial misunderstanding. While I did not think of SVG (thanks), I wanted to know how often authors have erred here by not properly encoding their data, expecting it to work. It just seems weird to me; the people I know who know about data URIs certainly know how percent encoding works ? often taking advantage of automatic tools for the conversion. Btw: Are there possible security implications of data URI parse changes? -- Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
Received on Saturday, 10 September 2011 18:04:50 UTC