- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 13:31:51 -0700
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Aryeh Gregor <ayg at aryeh.name> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan at chromium.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Aryeh Gregor <ayg at aryeh.name> wrote: >>> It's a few extra characters. ?I really think the increase in clarity >>> is worth it. ?Boolean parameters are much more confusing, and should >>> be avoided wherever possible. >> >> +1. I'm also OK with the argument if it's a string. > > Jonas? I'm ok with the string argument too. But I'm also fine with keeping it a boolean. I don't really see the risk that people will use the wrong interpretation of the boolean and that that wrong impression would spread through copy-past as being a very real risk. I agree boolean arguments can be a pain. But they are more of a pain on the caller side than on the callee side. / Jonas
Received on Friday, 28 October 2011 13:31:51 UTC