- From: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
- Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 20:02:35 +0200
On 10/16/2011 02:17 PM, Daniel Bates wrote: > How should overflow be handled when parsing integers? > > Step 8 of the parsing algorithm in both<http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#rules-for-parsing-integers> and<http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#non-negative-integers> doesn't mention how to handle integer overflow when interpreting the result of a sequence of base-ten integers. > > Currently in WebKit we consider such overflow a parsing error. Is there any reason not to consider overflow a parsing error? Regardless, I suggest codifying the handling of overflow in the aforementioned sections. Gecko also considers that an overflow is a parsing error. Presto and IE6 doesn't seem to. The specs should probably mention this by whether consider it as a parsing error or request the UA to default to the highest value (which Presto and IE6 seem to do but not using the same value). > This issue came up recently in WebKit with respect to the parsing of the maxlength attribute (https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68981). Actually, this problem wouldn't have been that annoying if Webkit was following the specs regarding maxlength attribute: if the content attribute value isn't a valid non-negative integer, the element has no maximum allowed value length. -- Mounir
Received on Sunday, 16 October 2011 11:02:35 UTC