- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 10:27:33 -0800
On Wed, 09 Nov 2011 09:52:43 -0800, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote: > On 11/9/11 9:25 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> It seems wrong to me to add new features to obsoleted features. If there >> are good reasons for using <frame>, maybe it should be made conforming. >> If there are no such reasons, there are no reasons either for adding new >> features to it. > > Well, there's implementation and conceptual simplicity. Saying that > @sandbox works for all browsing contexts is a lot simpler than saying it > works for a particular white- or black-list of tag names. Given the way <object> sometimes creates a browsing context and sometimes not (e.g. for images) I think we already lost that kind of simplicity. And seamless/height/width do not make sense for <frame> and HTMLFrameElement has various "features" that HTMLIFrameElement does not. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 9 November 2011 10:27:33 UTC