- From: Oli Studholme <whatwg.org@boblet.net>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 00:50:20 +0900
Hi All, Over at http://html5doctor.com we?ve been using this pattern when quoting e.g. from the HTML5 spec: <blockquote> <p>[block quote]</p> <footer>? <cite><a href="?">[title of work]</a></cite></footer> </blockquote> I wrote about our use of blockquote and footer in http://html5doctor.com/blockquote-q-cite/ recently, which lead to http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13082. To recap: Footer definition: ?The footer element represents a footer for its nearest ancestor sectioning content or sectioning root element. A footer typically contains information about its section such as who wrote it, links to related documents, copyright data, and the like.? Blockquote definition: ?The blockquote element represents a section that is quoted from another source. Content inside a blockquote must be quoted from another source, whose address, if it has one, may be cited in the cite attribute.? Simon felt that ?Content inside a blockquote must be quoted from another source? excludes footer. However the footer definition reads to me that footer is basically metadata *about* content (the non-footer or -header content of the sectioning or sectioning root element). I?m happy to propose some reasons for allowing this, but to start with does blockquote?s definition beat footer?s definition? Or, is footer considered content as far as the blockquote definition is concerned? Thanks in advance. peace - oli studholme
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2011 08:50:20 UTC