- From: Lin Clark <lin.w.clark@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 20:50:11 +0100
Itemtype in my example is like 'kind' in your example. You are right, it is basically a privileged property. Because the words type and kind are pretty synonymous (groups of things that have common characteristics), I would think that specifying an itemtype and then specifying a separate kind might be confusing to users, just because of the wording. -Lin On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Tue, 28 Jun 2011, Lin Clark wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > > > > > > > > > <div itemscope itemtype="http://example.com/"> > > > <meta itemprop="kind" content="A B"> > > > ... > > > </div> > > > > > > Would it make sense to use something like vocab here? > > > > <div itemscope vocab="http://example.com/" itemtype="A B http://C"> > > ... > > </div> > > The vocab="" attribute in this example is what itemtype="" is in the spec. > > What is itemtype="" in this example? (How is it different from a > property?) > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' > -- Lin Clark DERI, NUI Galway <http://www.deri.ie/> lin-clark.com twitter.com/linclark
Received on Tuesday, 28 June 2011 12:50:11 UTC