- From: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:52:21 -0700
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt at lachy.id.au>wrote: > On 2011-06-15 08:40, Roland Steiner wrote: > >> According to the HMTL5 spec, selectors are not limited to children of the >> scoping element (the parent element of<style scoped>). For example: >> >> <div class="foo"> >> <div> >> <style scoped> >> .foo p { display: none } >> </style> >> <p>To be or not to be, that is the question.</p> >> </div> >> <div> >> >> In above snippet, the selector in the scoped stylesheet would match, >> causing >> the<p> element to be hidden... >> >> >> The disadvantages: >> >> 1.) a scoped style may unexpectedly apply, because an arbitrary ancestor >> of >> the scoping element happens to partially match the scoped selector >> > > This is the purpose of the :scope pseudo-class that is defined to match the > contextual reference elemnt, which for scoped stylesheets, will be the > parent of the style element. > Requiring this prefix for things that are ostensibly "scoped" seems confused. As an author, I more often want the inversion, a scoped stylesheet explicitly beginning the match from what you refer to as the :scope and an explicit way to target from the document, say :root. > So you could rewrite the style above to be: > > :scope .foo p { display: none } > > Then .foo will only match elements within the div. > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/**selectors-api2/#the-scope-**pseudo-class<http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/selectors-api2/#the-scope-pseudo-class> > > -- > Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software > http://lachy.id.au/ > http://www.opera.com/ >
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2011 10:52:21 UTC