- From: Eduard Pascual <herenvardo@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:12:24 +0200
2011/6/15 Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at mit.edu>: > No, it wouldn't. ?The point here is to style based on a _form_ that is > invalid. ?Whether a form is valid or not is up to the language defining > forms, that being HTML. Sorry, I assumed the simple definition that a form is invalid if it contains invalid input elements, and there are proposals on the wiki to deal with selecting an element based on its children. Of course, something like form:invalid { ... } would be ideal, but a syntax like $form :invalid { ... } wouldn't be too bad. I missed the possibility of a validation script (onsubmit event handler) making more complex checks (like "if first field is X, then the second field can be anything but "Y""). However, there is no clean way to deal with those cases short of adding onchange handlers on all inputs: - If a browser attempts to run the onsubmit handler upon each change, to update the style of the form as soon as it becomes (in)valid, then there is a risk of the javascript having some side-effect that is not intended to happen on each change. - If a browser waits for a submit attempt, this can easily become confusing to users (the change in style should be triggered by the change that actually made the form invalid). That would partially depend on the actual style applied; but it could be easily implemented by the document author with a single javascript line (adding a class or some other attribute to the form), so the feature would be a sort of glorified syntax sugar. Maybe a sort of compromise would be implemented: checking for invalid individual elements and, if the onsubmit handler is known to not trigger side-effects, check it as well. But this sounds more like a hack. Is there something I am missing? Regards, Eduard Pascual
Received on Wednesday, 15 June 2011 12:12:24 UTC