[whatwg] a rel=attachment

On 2011-07-22 09:24, Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>>
>>> That isn't really in scope for the HTML spec, it's something either
>>> for the HTTP spec or the Content-Disposition spec (if HTTP doesn't
>>> define th header itself) to define.
>>
>> Is there a specific reason why the new text doesn't mention
>> Content-Disposition anymore?
>
> Not only does the new text mention Content-Disposition, it actually refers
> to its specification multiple times. Are you looking at the right diff?

I was looking at the diff r6318. Maybe there were more changes?

Best regards, Julian

Received on Friday, 22 July 2011 03:37:10 UTC