[whatwg] a rel=attachment

• From: Peter Kasting <pkasting@google.com>
• Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:20:54 -0700
• Message-ID: <CAAHOzFBmD5V4OKPG-xH4uZj-dNxgsEMnbEOL0rnU5=6NpEnSnw@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Tantek ?elik <tantek at cs.stanford.edu>wrote:

> * existing rel="enclosure" spec - download the link when clicked/activated.


I object to rel="enclosure" purely on naming grounds.  It is completely
unintuitive.  I don't find the fact that a spec exists for it a compelling
reason to use it.  (Specs exist for lots of things, many of them bad.)

PK

Received on Friday, 15 July 2011 18:20:54 UTC