W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > July 2011

[whatwg] <details>, <summary> and styling

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 20:24:10 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1107152021360.2079@ps20323.dreamhostps.com>
On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
> Wilhelm Joys Andersen wrote:
> > 
> >    "If there is no child summary element [of the details element], the
> >    user agent should provide its own legend (e.g. "Details")." [1]
> > 
> > How exactly should this legend be provided?
> 
> Since the situation raises implementation difficulties, it would be best 
> to make the summary element required in a details element, i.e. to force 
> authors to provide a summary.

It is required. That doesn't force authors to do anything, though.


> But it appears to be an undue burden to require browsers to provide a 
> default legend, which would need to be different for different 
> languages.

Making it required doesn't help user agents deal with pages where it is 
omitted.


> A key issue with the details element is that it does not degrade well. 
> It's difficult to say how much this could be improved. In any case, the 
> fact that the details themselves - the content of the details element 
> excluding the summary element - do not constitute an element makes 
> things rather difficult.

It's easy to wrap them in an element for fallback purposes.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 15 July 2011 13:24:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:34 UTC