- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:13:05 +0200
On 2011-07-13 22:58, Adam Barth wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Julian Reschke<julian.reschke at gmx.de> wrote: >> On 2011-07-13 22:31, Adam Barth wrote: >>> Adding allow-plugins today would defeat the prevention of parent >>> redirection. >>> >>> The short answer is we need an API for informing plugins of the >>> sandbox flags and a way of confirming that the plugins understand >>> those bits before we can allow plugins inside sandboxed frames. >> >> ...but that API is outside the scope of what the W3C and the WhatWG >> currently do, so I think it would be great if defining this flag could be >> decoupled from progress on the plugin API layers. > > It is coupled in the sense that we can't implement the flag unless and > until such a plug-in API exists. Yes, but we can *define* the flag in HTML and write down what it means with respect to plugin APIs. Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 13 July 2011 14:13:05 UTC