- From: Michael Davidson <mpd@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 15:08:08 -0700
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan at chromium.org> wrote: > I'm not sure what the privacy issue here is given that we restrict to > same-domain. You're already using the site, so it's just whether they can > tell that you use them as a protocol handler. I don't see a problem with > exposing that. > FWIW, notifications already exposes this: http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebNotifications/publish/FeaturePermissions.html Seems best just to crib what they already did. Michael > > >> Safer option would be if registeredState() would just return >> "ASKED" or "NOTASKED" >> >> >> -Olli >> > >
Received on Friday, 1 July 2011 15:08:08 UTC