- From: Zachary Ozer <zach@longtailvideo.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:22:56 -0500
We never make any promises about when we'll get something into an official release, but I think we'd start playing around with it in our development version once a reference implementation was publicly available. -- Zachary Ozer Developer, LongTail Video w: longtailvideo.com ? e: zach at longtailvideo.com ? p: 212.244.0140 ? f: 212.656.1335 JW Player? |? Bits on the Run? |? AdSolution On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Roger H?gensen <rescator at emsai.net> wrote: > On 2011-01-20 19:16, Zachary Ozer wrote: >> >> == New Proposal == > > I like this. It seems you laid out everything to ensure a balanced buffer, > kinda like a moving window buffer which I pointed out earlier. > So as far as I can see, your proposal looks pretty solid, unless there are > any implementation snafus. (looks at the Chrome, Safari, Opera, Firefox guys > in the list (hmm, where's the IE guys?)) > I really like the way you described the "state3", and I think that would be > my personal preference for playback myself. I assume JW player would be very > quick at supporting/using it? > > -- > Roger "Rescator" H?gensen. > Freelancer - http://www.EmSai.net/ > >
Received on Thursday, 20 January 2011 16:22:56 UTC