- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 21:31:14 -0500
> Sorry, I've lost track of this part of the discussion. Is functions > cloning needed for non-copying messages, or is this tangental? It depends on what you want to be able to pass across such non-copying messages, basically. For simple things, it's not needed. > My impression for zero-copy messaging was to define it as closely to > regular messaging as possible: visible behavior almost identical to > structured clone, except for the side-effect of disabling the object > after the postMessage call completes and some special handling if > multiple objects receive the message. Then you don't need to do anything funky with functions. -Boris
Received on Sunday, 16 January 2011 18:31:14 UTC