- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 22:01:26 -0500
On 1/15/11 9:51 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Boris Zbarsky<bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote: >> I've been looking at the setTimeout clamping in Gecko recently, and one >> thing I've been interesting in trying is to clamp differently in different >> windows (for example, have a lower clamp in active windows and a higher one >> in inactive ones). That's not something the spec seems to allow right now, >> but I think it would be beneficial to users in terms of preventing inactive >> windows from accidentally hogging the CPU. > > This isn't allowed by "Optionally, wait a further user-agent defined > length of time"? Hmm. It may well be, yes. Good point! -Boris
Received on Saturday, 15 January 2011 19:01:26 UTC