- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 23:12:25 +1100
You can always chuck it in the whatwg wiki http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/Main_Page. :-) Silvia. On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Steve Lacey <sjl at chromium.org> wrote: > crickets... > > I'll work on a proposal spec for this ;-) > > On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Steve Lacey <sjl at chromium.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Steve Lacey <sjl at chromium.org> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Chris Double <chris.double at double.co.nz> >>> wrote: >>> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Steve Lacey <sjl at chromium.org> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> But for the media element I'd like to propose raw bytes instead of a >>> >> rate as this allows the developer to construct their own rates (if >>> >> needed) based on whatever window they want. It would also be useful to >>> >> separate audio from video. A suggestion might be: >>> > >>> > Raw bytes sounds good. >>> > >>> >> unsigned long audioBytesDecoded; >>> >> unsigned long videoBytesDecoded; >>> >> >>> >> Though this seems a little strange to have these specifically on the >>> >> media element as they reference particular media types. Another idea >>> >> would be to move these to the video element and also add >>> >> audioBytesDecoded to the audio element. >>> > >>> > Moving them to the video and audio element would mean you can't get >>> > the audioBytesDecoded on a video element which is what I'm assuming >>> > you want by having the two values. >>> >>> Yeah - I'd also add audioBytesDecoded to the audio element, which is >>> an unpleasant dupe. >>> >>> > >>> > Note that the Mozilla implementation I proposed has had a counter >>> > proposal by another mozilla developer and is being developed further. >>> > See: >>> > >>> > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580531 >>> >>> Thanks. Taking a further look at that. >>> >> >> Reviving thread... >> >> I have an initial patch in webkit (http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/77394) >> and the chromium work is underway - I wonder what might be a good approach >> to drive the apis closer together towards a real spec that everyone is happy >> with? >> >> There seems to be a lot of general agreement here (at least in principal >> :-) that this is needed. We'll be doing a bunch of experimentation once this >> has landed in chromium. >> >> Cheers! >> Steve >> >
Received on Sunday, 13 February 2011 04:12:25 UTC