[whatwg] Media elements statistics

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Steve Lacey <sjl at chromium.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Chris Double <chris.double at double.co.nz>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Steve Lacey <sjl at chromium.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> But for the media element I'd like to propose raw bytes instead of a
> >> rate as this allows the developer to construct their own rates (if
> >> needed) based on whatever window they want. It would also be useful to
> >> separate audio from video. A suggestion might be:
> >
> > Raw bytes sounds good.
> >
> >> unsigned long audioBytesDecoded;
> >> unsigned long videoBytesDecoded;
> >>
> >> Though this seems a little strange to have these specifically on the
> >> media element as they reference particular media types. Another idea
> >> would be to move these to the video element and also add
> >> audioBytesDecoded to the audio element.
> >
> > Moving them to the video and audio element would mean you can't get
> > the audioBytesDecoded on a video element which is what I'm assuming
> > you want by having the two values.
>
> Yeah - I'd also add audioBytesDecoded to the audio element, which is
> an unpleasant dupe.
>
> >
> > Note that the Mozilla implementation I proposed has had a counter
> > proposal by another mozilla developer and is being developed further.
> > See:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=580531
>
> Thanks. Taking a further look at that.
>

Reviving thread...

I have an initial patch in webkit (http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/77394)
and the chromium work is underway - I wonder what might be a good approach
to drive the apis closer together towards a real spec that everyone is happy
with?

There seems to be a lot of general agreement here (at least in principal :-)
that this is needed. We'll be doing a bunch of experimentation once this has
landed in chromium.

Cheers!
Steve

Received on Monday, 7 February 2011 13:55:37 UTC