- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:23:49 -0500
On 12/15/11 3:10 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > Whether it's<wbr> or<nobr> that gets defined in terms that violate CSS, > the result is the same as far as I can tell. Fair. We may need changes or extensions to CSS if nothing else works. > If we make a change here it seems better to move towards just specifying > everything in terms of CSS, e.g. as the suggestion in my last e-mail on > this thread. The question really is whether that CSS-only solution is a > plausible way forward or if it has problems I haven't thought of. It seems plausible to me; we should run it by Elika. -Boris
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2011 12:23:49 UTC