- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 20:55:51 +0100
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 19:40:04 +0100, Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela at cs.tut.fi> wrote: > The whole idea of extending the repertoire is wrong. We have lived with > a certain set of entity references (now being renamed ?named character > references?), widely supported by browsers, except possibly in XHTML > mode. Authors who need other characters can enter them as such, using > UTF-8 (which is being favored, is it not?) or using numeric character > references. Personally, I like named entities, I use them all the time to get the correct Unicode code point (e.g. data:text/html,·). That is often faster than looking the character up somehow. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 11:55:51 UTC