- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:16:09 -0800
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:14 PM, James Hawkins <jhawkins at google.com> wrote: > Originally we envisioned using a self-closing tag placed in head for > the intent tag; however, we're now leaning towards not using > self-closing and having the tag be placed in the body with fallback > content, e.g., to install an extension to provide similar > functionality. > > <intent action="webintents.org/share"> > ?Click here to install our extension that implements sharing! > </intent> > > What are your thoughts on this route? So, when the <intent> tag is supported, it's not displayed at all, and instead solely handled by the browser? This seems okay to me. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2011 13:16:09 UTC