- From: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 16:28:52 -0500
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas at sicking.cc> wrote: > The main use case for wanting to support scripts getting appears to be > wanting to abort JSONP loads. Potentially to issue it with new > parameters. This is a decent use case, but given the racyness > described above in webkit, it doesn't seem like a reliable technique > in existing browsers. > > So the questions are: > > 1. Should we keep the spec as it currently stands? > 2. Are browsers willing to follow the specced behavior? > 3. Do we want to support the use-case of abourting JSONP loads? > This use case should be covered by this: http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-September/033132.html I don't actually see the mentioned readyState attribute in HTMLScriptElement, though. I think that if aborting script loads is worth supporting (which seems reasonable), it should be supported in a way that doesn't cause race conditions (such as the above, or any of the other proposals for delayed script execution). -- Glenn Maynard
Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 13:28:52 UTC