- From: Tommy Widenflycht <tommyw@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:33:22 +0200
Imho conceptually streamed media is not the same as data from a file and thus should be separated. Specifically the code for the video tag for example now has to ask around what this URL actually points to before taking action. /Tommy On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 22:08, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > On Thu, 11 Aug 2011, Tommy Widenflycht (?~[~O?~Z??~[~X?~[~X?~Z?) wrote: > > > > Would it be possible to give the associated URL for a mediastream to > > have its own protocol, for example mediastream:, instead of the proposed > > blob:? > > > > window . URL . createObjectURL(stream) > > Mints a Blob URL to refer to the given MediaStream. > > > > This would tremendously help the implementation. > > Could you elaborate? In what sense does it impact the implementation? > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' -- Tommy Widenflycht, Senior Software Engineer Google Sweden AB, Kungsbron 2, SE-11122 Stockholm, Sweden Org. nr. 556656-6880 And yes, I have to include the above in every outgoing email according to EU law.
Received on Friday, 12 August 2011 02:33:22 UTC