- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 22:58:21 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Bjartur Thorlacius wrote: > On 5/4/11, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote: > >> IMO browsers should implement <link>. <link> should be implementable > >> cross-browser in CSS. > > > > Unfortunately, what we want and what we get don't always match. :-) > > On a more serious note, implementing <link> can't be that hard. It's not a matter of it being hard. Some browsers have even implemented it and then dropped support. > I'll probably patch my UA myself when I get the graphics layer working > on my system (or just use links2). But I'm slowly coming to the > conclusion that <a> should be used for creating hyperlinks that seem to > belong to head, in a tree of html>body>aside>a, for compatibility with > mainstream UAs. That seems fine to me. > >> My actual concern regard navigation links not forming a part of the > >> linear body of the document, but still being in <body>. Navigation > >> links will most likely be rendered "out of band," potentially only on > >> demand and paged/scrolled seperately from the body, or at the end of > >> the document in one dimensional renderings (such as audio and text > >> streams). They might even be triggered without being rendered at all, > >> such as by scrolling out of range of the current document. > > > > It seems most authors desire far more control over their navigation > > links. On many pages, it's almost as if the navigation links are more > > important to the authors than the content, at least when you look at > > the amount of effort put into them... > > Sadly, the things authors desire may conflict with the things users > desire. I also desire control over navigation links (among many other > things). From authors, I desire only content. Unfortunately, as I said above... what we want and what we get don't always match. There's not much we can do here to push authors further. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 2 August 2011 15:58:21 UTC