- From: Edward Gerhold <edward.gerhold@googlemail.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 07:31:35 +0200
Dear Working Group and Subscribers, i would like to correct myself a little, because i?d been a bit more OT than i wanted to. First of all, you could get me wrong, understanding the cache. I could even cache more pages of my Joomla! with the current. The problem is: Cached once, the files are NEVER being updated again, except the manifest changes a byte. For that, the "modify" function is doing the job. I should better call it "update" function, to point onto the current terms used. You couldn?t read that in my last mail anyways, so you could assume a misunderstanding of the cache on my side. Second thing, the rename of the URLs, or better a local and a network identifier is neccessary. It would be good, if the user agent could care for local identifiers, too. The programmer would sometimes have to give the page a new name to prevent overwriting another file (with access to the cache, maybe even dupe names but other array positions work?). Last - The fourth point should be removed from my suggestion. The caching of the whole request, answer, the two HTTP headers + data sent and received, came when writing the mail. With that i messed the whole content of my suggestion up. I think the request data, the http headers are not so important, because the MIME type IS already cached and there are no more very important informations. I bet you laughed. Otherwise, the whole request is cool, but that messed the mail up. I?ll try to write the "update files in the cache" problem, "how to cache a content manager" and the interfaces (but in webidl) down next. I?ve got the IDL printed for a while and took it with me in the subways some time ago, i should get that working. Hope you can make the cache a bigger -BETTER- component in H5. With friendly regards Edward Gerhold
Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2011 22:31:35 UTC