- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:35:21 -0700
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela at cs.tut.fi> wrote: > Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> However, the default visual behavior >> of <details> is suggested in the HTML spec. > > You misspelled ?the current HTML(5) draft/sketch?. And I would not take it > as more than a suggestion in a work in progress, which is what it really is. > >>> I know that many CSS property names are misleading. But >>> list-style-type, as defined in published CSS recommendations, isn?t >>> bound to any ?::marker?. >> >> It certainly is, in the Lists spec. > > Please cite the recommendation by its official name and/or URL. Sigh. I'm not going to respond to you if you're just blatantly trolling. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 14:35:21 UTC