- From: Jukka K. Korpela <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 22:30:43 +0300
Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > <details> is definitely something we want to make fully > author-stylable. I don?t. Who?s this ?we? you are talking about, and why do they want to make <details> author-stylable even before a single browser has _any_ support to the element, at the functional level? >> Why should we use list-style-type for something that clearly ain?t >> no list? > > Because it appears that the disclosure triangle wants to have the same > behavior that ::marker does. Does it? Why do you imply the visual concept of a ?disclosure triangle?, and how does that relate to the behavior proposed for ?::marker? in some draft? > Don't be misled by the name - all that > list-style-type does is help construct the default value for 'content' > on ::marker. It has nothing to do with things that are semantically > lists, per se. I know that many CSS property names are misleading. But list-style-type, as defined in published CSS recommendations, isn?t bound to any ?::marker?. -- Yucca, http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/
Received on Friday, 8 April 2011 12:30:43 UTC