- From: Nils Dagsson Moskopp <nils-dagsson-moskopp@dieweltistgarnichtso.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:59:18 +0200
21.09.10 Roger H?gensen <rescator at emsai.net>: > On 2010-09-20 10:16, Olli Pettay wrote: > >> > >>> I do think browser UI for large uploads is terrible and needs to > >>> be fixed. > >> > >> I agree! > > > > Yeah, the UI is terrible, but that is about browser implementations > > and not about any specification. > > Well! There is nothing preventing the specs from providing a minimum > UI guideline that should be followed by UAs. UAs compete on interface, too. As long as the standards are open and consistent, why should implementations be constrained more than absolutely necessary? Keep in mind that HTML is already one of the most important file formats and may be for decades to come. I recommend filing bugs with UAs to get this deficiencies cleared up. -- Nils Dagsson Moskopp // erlehmann <http://dieweltistgarnichtso.net> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 230 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100921/cb895e62/attachment.pgp>
Received on Monday, 20 September 2010 15:59:18 UTC