- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 17:15:27 -0700
On Sep 8, 2010, at 12:58 , Aryeh Gregor wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 1:14 PM, David Singer <singer at apple.com> wrote: >> what about "don't sniff if the HTML gave you a mime type" (i.e. a source element with a type attribute), or at least "don't sniff for the purposes of determining CanPlay, dispatch, if the HTML source gave you a mime type"? > > What advantage does this serve? It both significantly reduces the footprint of sniffing (knocks out a whole load of cases), and clarifies that 'canplay' decisions don't need to sniff (so you don't sniff a whole bunch of different files). 'Non-configured servers' is a valid excuse for HTTP content-type being wrong (for a few cases), but I can't think of any reason to disbelieve the page author, can you? > > On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:13 PM, And Clover <and-py at doxdesk.com> wrote: >> Perhaps I *meant* to serve a non-video >> file with something that looks a fingerprint from a video format at the top. > > Anything's possible, but it's vastly more likely that you just made a mistake. It may be possible to make one file that is valid under two formats. Kinda like those old competitions "write a single file that when compiled and run through as many languages as possible prints "hello, world!" :-). David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 8 September 2010 17:15:27 UTC