- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:52:46 -0700
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 4:45 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists at inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 08/29/2010 08:00 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >> On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 8:15 PM, David John Burrowes >> <bainong at davidjohnburrowes.com> ?wrote: >>> >>> I agree that they don't have access to versioning info from within the >>> languages. >>> >>> But, CSS has some sense of versions (CSS, CSS2, and CSS3). ?This gives me >>> some >>> ability to say "ah, SurfBrowser 1.0 and 2.0 supported CSS1, but with 3.0 >>> they >>> supported some of CSS2 etc etc. >> >> To be honest, no you can't. ?Not with such large labels, at least. >> You'll never be able to say "X browser supports CSS3", but CSS3 isn't >> a thing. ?You can name individual modules only, which is equivalent to >> naming large features of HTML. > > How do you define a "large feature of HTML"? Roughly, "has a subheading in the TOC". Depending on the exact organization, this might actually be a heading or subsubheading. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2010 16:52:46 UTC