- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:59:38 -0700
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:11 PM, James Salsman <jsalsman at gmail.com> wrote: > Does anyone object to form input type=file > accept="audio/*;capture=microphone" using Speex as a default, as if it > were specified > accept="audio/x-speex;quality=7;bitrate=16000;capture=microphone" or > to allowing the requesting of different speex qualities and bitrates > using those mime type parameters? > > Speex at quality=7 is a reasonable open source default audio vocoder. > Runner-up alternatives would include audio/ogg, which is a higher > bandwidth format appropriate for multiple speakers or polyphonic > music; audio/mpeg, a popular but encumbered format; audio/wav, a union > of several different sound file formats, some of which are encumbered; > etc. For what it's worth, I suspect it will be almost as has hard to settle on an audio codec as it has been to settle on a video codec. Why speex instead of vorbis for example. If WebM is a success it seems like vorbis in a WebM container would make a lot of sense. But yes, if you can get all vendors major browser vendors, one of which is not on this list, to agree on a codec and container format for audio, then that would be great. I suspect mozilla would be willing to support it, though I can only speak for myself and not the rest of the mozilla project. / Jonas
Received on Wednesday, 1 September 2010 11:59:38 UTC