- From: Hugh Guiney <hugh.guiney@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:52:50 -0400
I am authoring a video portfolio page using Kroc Camen's Video For Everybody code <http://camendesign.com/code/video_for_everybody> for each piece. In this code he includes a download section for users who may be unable to play the video live on the site, e.g. because they lack both HTML5 (or the proper browser codecs) and Flash support. As this hopefully won't be a problem for most users, I would prefer not to distract them with this information unless they decide they need it, and therefore have chosen to mark it up with <details>. However, I feel this "Download" portion is also important enough to be its own subsection, as it is distinct from the surrounding content and may be useful to navigate to as part of the document outline. The obvious way to accomplish this would be for instance: <details> <summary><h1>Download</h1></summary> <ul> <li><a href="video.mp4">MP4</a></li> <li><a href="video.ogg">OGG</a></li> ... </ul> </details> but this is invalid via the current spec which only allows <summary> to contain phrasing content. I could give it its own heading outside of <details>, but this would be redundant as I would have to do duplicate the heading text in both <h1> and <summary>, and it makes the expansion action area ambiguous. A mouse user might encounter the collapsed menu and not know whether to click on the heading or the summary to expand it?or even just consider it the author's error, or a glitch. Even if I were to use different text for each element, I find few things to be appropriate in this context that are not similarly redundant. "Download" for the heading and "Video Format Options" for the summary? The fact that the list is of format options would be reasonably apparent by the link text for each item indicating "MP4", "OGG", etc. My proposal to address this would be to allow heading content under <summary>?or, conversely, to allow <summary> to be used as a descendant of <details> rather than just the first child, such that you could wrap headings around it, as phrasing content is already allowed under <details>. But, the latter changes structure and therefore parsing whereas the former is simply a validation change.
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2010 19:52:50 UTC