- From: Eric Uhrhane <ericu@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 15:49:09 -0700
How about using a Blob URL? See the discussion here: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/group/chromium-html5/tree/browse_frm/thread/4288931009182422/12703ab802469702. On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Samuel Ytterbrink <samuel at ytterbrink.nu> wrote: > > Hi I have found?something?really?frustrating?with the specs. to show that I > at least?read the blog about proposing features here is the questions and > answers: > > What is the problem you are trying to solve? > To create?sophisticated?single file webpages. > What is the feature you are suggesting to help solve it? > Some sort of inline Web Worker.?Using?Data URL is what i have in mind or by > creating a class. > What is the processing model for that feature, including error handling? > This should be very clear, including things such as event timing if the > feature involves events, how to create graphs representing the data in the > case of semantic proposals, etc. > Well the same as for other URLs, except that it inherit its location > information from its creator. > Why do you think browsers would implement this feature? > To make standalone local webpages easier to be used by users. And in some > cases faster dl of large pages. > Why do you think authors would use this feature? > Webpages are more then just information, its programs. Programs in one file > is easier to have. And also for testing quick things, inline is a?Bliss. > What evidence is there that this feature is desparately needed? > I only have my own, trying to build a more optimal standalone DAISY player > (would be nice if i could rewrite it with web workers). And that google > gears seems to support it. > > So is this a totally bad idea? > //Samuel Ytterbrink > p.s. hope i posted it in the correct Mailing list. and that my spelling > isn't that bad. >
Received on Friday, 15 October 2010 15:49:09 UTC