- From: Peter Kasting <pkasting@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:59:18 -0700
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c at gmail.com<Simetrical%2Bw3c at gmail.com> > wrote: > If this is meant to be vendor-neutral, there needs to be some way for > arbitrary search engines to advertise support for this feature to > supporting browsers. That depends on whether the browser supplies info to the DOM APIs at all times, or only when it thinks the target page supports this feature. Clearly, in the former case, the browser doesn't need to know what the page can and cannot do. If the latter, then yes, extending the OSDD is necessary. But as I said, that's still somewhat orthogonal to the question of whether a DOM API like this should exist at all, and what it should look like, assuming that the browser is actually going to populate it accurately. But I might be misunderstanding something here, since the proposal > only gave an API This proposal is not by any means the totality of everything involved with "instant"-style support. It is only a piece. PK -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20101014/385ae779/attachment.htm>
Received on Thursday, 14 October 2010 11:59:18 UTC