- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 11:18:12 +0100
On 26.11.2010 05:20, Brett Zamir wrote: > I'd like to propose reserving two protocols for use with > navigator.registerProtocolHandler: "urn" and "xri" (or possibly xriNN > where NN is a version number). > > See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Resource_Identifier for info > on XRI (basically allows the equivalents of URN but with a user-defined > namespace and without needing ICANN/IANA approval). Although it was You don't need ICANN/IANA approval. You can use informal URN namespaces, use a URN scheme that allows just grabbing a name (such as URN:UUID) *or* write a small spec; for the latter, the approval is *IETF* consensus (write an Internet Draft, then ask the IESG for publication as RFC). Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 26 November 2010 02:18:12 UTC