- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:02:41 +0100
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:48:03 +0100, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky at mit.edu> wrote: > On 11/23/10 12:58 PM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> So that you do not need namespace knowledge. > > Namespace knowledge where? As an implementor? Or as an author? Either? > The whole point if a universal .classList and .className is to make > authors not have to deal with namespace knowledge, imo. And it doesn't > require mapping to a specific attr name for that. So if I set Element.className on an element that is not in a namespace and has no attributes. Its attributes collection remains empty or something? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2010 11:02:41 UTC