- From: Roger Hågensen <rescator@emsai.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 09:11:47 +0100
On 2010-03-17 17:28, Jonas Sicking wrote: > >>/ I'm wondering if data-* attributes should be renamed to priv-* to make > />>/ it clearer that it's page's _private_ data. > />>/ > />>/ "data-" is such a nice generic prefix that I'm afraid sooner or later > />>/ someone will start basing microformats-like markup on that. > />/ > />/ It's not a bad idea... Unfortunately data-* is already being used quite a > />/ lot and has been widely advertised, so we have to be careful with this. > />/ Anyone else have an opinion on this? > / > I don't feel strongly that either name is better. Though I would not > that priv- doesn't make things much clearer since it's totally > undefined who it's private to. > Maybe a better naming would have been: doc-* It's short, it kinda reflect what it's related to as well right? Or does that clash with something? Regards, Roger. -- Roger "Rescator" H?gensen. Freelancer - http://EmSai.net/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.whatwg.org/pipermail/whatwg-whatwg.org/attachments/20100318/eddbd7f1/attachment.htm>
Received on Thursday, 18 March 2010 01:11:47 UTC