- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:41:04 -0700
Hi Silvia, Back in may last year I brought [1] up the fact that there are two use cases for temporal media fragments: 1. Skipping to a particular point in a longer resource, such as wanting to start a video at a particular point while still allowing seeking in the entire resource. This is currently supported by for example YouTube [2]. It is also the model used for web pages where including a fragment identifier only scrolls to a particular point, while allowing the user to scroll to any point both before and after the identified fragment. 2. Only displaying part of a video. For example out of a longer video from a discussion panel, only displaying the part where a specific topic is discussed. While there seemed to be agreement [3][4] that these are in fact two separate use cases, it seems like the media fragments draft is only attempting to address one. Additionally, it only addresses the one that has the least precedence as far as current technologies on the web goes. Was this an intentional omission? Is it planned to solve use case 1 above in a future revision? [1] http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-May/019596.html [2] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyQrKvc7_NU#t=201 [3] http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-May/019718.html [4] http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2009-May/019721.html / Jonas On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > The W3C WG for media fragments has published a Last Call Working Draft > at http://www.w3.org/TR/media-frags/ . > > The idea of the spec is to enable addressing sub-parts of audio-visual > resources through URIs, such as http://example.com/video.ogv?t=10,40 > to address seconds 10-40 out of video.ogv. This is relevant for use in > the <audio> and <video> elements and can help focus the playback to a > specific subpart. > > This specification will provide "deep linking" as a standard > specification for media resources. > > Incidentally, such functionality is also available at YouTube, see > http://www.google.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=116618 > . > > "The Working Group encourages feedback about this document by > developers and researchers who have interest in multimedia content > addressing and retrieval on the web and by developers and researchers > who have interest in Semantic Web technologies for content description > and annotation. Please send comments about this document to > public-media-fragment at w3.org mailing list (public archive) by 27 > August 2010." > > Cheers, > Silvia. >
Received on Wednesday, 30 June 2010 11:41:04 UTC