W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > whatwg@whatwg.org > June 2010

[whatwg] Technical Parity with W3C HTML Spec

From: Mike Shaver <mike.shaver@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 14:48:37 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimk2dL_k8_5QGzgJMENBzWfBVxR0Y2GZCMvVAkG@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Ian Hickson <ian at hixie.ch> wrote:
> I value technical merit even higher than convergence.

How is technical merit assessed?  Removing Theora from the
specification, for example, seems like it was for political rather
than technical reasons, if I understand how you use the terms.  How
can one learn of the technical motivations of decisions such as the
change to require ImageData for Canvas, or participate in their
evaluation prior to them gaining the incumbent's advantage of being
present in the specification text?

Received on Friday, 25 June 2010 14:48:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 22 January 2020 16:59:24 UTC